Drawing for DRANCO

USPTO serial 79211271

DRANCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5472051Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2018
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DRANCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew T. Rissler

Andrew T. Rissler Patel & Almeida, P.C.22647 Ventura Blvd., Ste 531Woodland Hills, CA 91364United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, waste conveying machines, waste crushing machines, food waste disposers, waste and trash separator machines, machines for separating recyclable materials, machines for sorting recycled bottles and removing non-conforming materials, machines for waste anaerobic digestion, namely, waste digesters, waste mixers and waste feeding pumps; waste anaerobic digestion plants; Machine tools for removing waste, trash and waste materialACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 8, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 26, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 21, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 22, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 9, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 18, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance