USPTO serial 79211357
STEEL HR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NITKIN, DINISHA F
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEEL HR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Saidman
Perry J. Saidman Saidman DesignLaw Group8601 Georgia Avenue, Suite 603Silver Spring, MD 20910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Smart watches and bracelets equipped with data monitoring and reporting functions relating to physical condition, training and activity, namely, data relating to time, distance, pace, angular velocity, weight management, calories burned and level of accumulated activity; smart watches and bracelets for communicating data to personal digital assistants, smartphones, mobile devices and personal computers by means of sensors, online Internet sites and other computer and electronic communication networks; wireless electronic apparatus for transmission of sound, images or data; wireless electronic apparatus for monitoring and controlling the function of other electronic apparatus; pedometers; speed indicators; personal electronic apparatus for displaying, measuring, recording, organizing, analyzing, manipulating and receiving data, text, images and audio files relating to health, well-being and fitness; wireless receivers used for detecting, storing and processing electronic data emanating from a sensor that records data linked to fitness activity, namely, data relating to time, distance, pace, heart rate and body rhythm, as well as calories burned; electric or electronic sensors for detecting, measuring, processing, collecting, recording and transmitting general data relating to well-being, sleep cycles, heart rhythm and physical activity; computer software and computer software applications for mobile apparatus used for the recording, organization, transmission, reception and analysis of texts, data, images and audio files in relation to health and well-being; computer software and computer software applications for mobile apparatus for wireless transmission of data, reception, processing thereof and for transmission and display of information linked to fitness activity; USB cables; cell electrical battery and battery chargers | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Watch; bracelets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |