USPTO serial 79211504
DAM GIM SSAM BY KYOCHON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAM GIM SSAM BY KYOCHON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; noodle-based prepared meals; Korean-style dried seaweed rolls containing cooked rice (gimbap); kimchi pancakes (kimchijeon); crust of overcooked rice (nurungji); cooked dish consisting primarily of sliced oval rice cakes with broth (tteokguk); Korean-style dumplings (mandu); buckwheat vermicelli; cooked barley; roasted coffee beans; cooked rice mixed with vegetables and beef (bibimbap); mung bean pancake (bindaetteok); rice-based pudding dessert; rice-based snack food; prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; rice balls; sushi; chopped noodles (kalguksu); cold soybean soup noodle | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Canteen services; tourist eating house services; lunch box restaurant chain services; restaurant and hotel services; restaurant services; buffet restaurants; salad bars; western style restaurants; providing food and drink in restaurant chains; mobile cafe services for providing food and drink; mobile restaurant services; Japanese restaurants; traditional tea cafes; Chinese restaurants; cafe and cafeteria services; take-away food services; cart bars; snack stall; pizza parlors; Korean restaurants | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2019 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |