USPTO serial 79211506
DPC DERMA PURE CLINIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DPC DERMA PURE CLINIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Eyebrow cosmetics; make-up; cosmetic preparations for baths; shower creams; sunscreen preparations; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetics for the face and body; hair lotions; make-up removing preparations; cosmetics; oils for perfumes and scents; perfume; false eyelashes; beauty masks; shampoos; cosmetic soaps; beauty soap; liquid bath soaps; cosmetics for animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Services for the care of the skin; obesity clinic; dermatology; tattooing; beauty consultancy; hairdressing; beauty services; visagists' services; manicuring; barber shop services; artificial tanning services; solarium services; skin care salons; skin beauty salons; make-up services; health spa services; massage; foot massage services; massage services; acupressure therapy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |