USPTO serial 79211593
BELVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5609001Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2018
- Examiner
- SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BELVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Air vehicles, namely, helicopters, airplanes; water vehicles, namely, boats, water scooters; bicycles; mopeds; mini cars; minibikes; go-kart; electric bicycles; motorcycle sidecars; quads in the nature of all terrain vehicles; off-road vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 21, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |