USPTO serial 79211598
GREENZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5905646Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 2019
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GREENZONE PEST INNOVATIONS PTY LTD
MOORABBIN VIC 3189, AU
Other trademarks owned by GREENZONE PEST INNOVATIONS PTY LTD
GREENZONE PEST INNOVATIONS PTY LTD
MOORABBIN VIC 3189, AU
Other trademarks owned by GREENZONE PEST INNOVATIONS PTY LTD
GREENZONE PEST INNOVATIONS PTY LTD
MOORABBIN VIC 3189, AU
Other trademarks owned by GREENZONE PEST INNOVATIONS PTY LTD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles G. Zug
Charles G. Zug Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP301 S. College St.Suite 2300, IP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Preparations for destroying vermin, pesticides, termiticides, and insecticides, all of the foregoing for use in buildings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Building materials, namely, foamed building materials, namely, non-metal barriers for insect and termite control made from expansion joint foam and polyethylene foam, building materials containing bifenthrin, namely, non-metal building materials in the nature of barriers to prevent insect and termite infiltration; materials made from foam for use in building and construction, namely, non-metal insect and termite barriers made of expansion joint foam and of polyethylene foam containing bifenthrin; materials made from foam for use in building and construction as insect barriers, namely non-metal barriers made from expansion joint foam containing bifenthrin | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Building installation services, namely, installation of expansion joint foam being insect and termite barriers; advice in relation to building materials being termite barriers, namely, technical consultation in the field of building materials consisting of non-metal termite barriers, and the integration of termite repellent into expansion joint foam for application to all elements of construction that require termite management systems; advice in relation to the use of preparations for destroying vermin, pesticides, termiticides, insecticides, namely, providing advice concerning termite and pest control and vermin extermination for commercial and industrial buildings and residential homes, and the integration of termite repellent into expansion joint foam for application to building materials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GREENZONE PEST INNOVATIONS PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by GREENZONE PEST INNOVATIONS PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by GREENZONE PEST INNOVATIONS PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named GREENZONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |