USPTO serial 79211611
ATOMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5808879Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2019
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATOMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anessa O. Kramer
Anessa O. Kramer Firm Name: Honigman LLPSTE 10139400 WOODWARD AVEBLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | photographic equipment and parts and accessories therefor, namely, cameras and camera structural parts, cinematographic cameras, connecting devices for photographic equipment, namely, cable connectors, mounting devices for photographic equipment and converters; cameras and structural parts therefor; digital cameras and structural parts therefor; camera lenses; batteries and battery chargers for cameras and digital cameras; remote controls for cameras and digital cameras; cases adapted for cameras and digital cameras; straps for cameras and digital cameras; electronic downloadable publications in the nature of manuals in the field of video and photography; computer hardware in the nature of integrated circuit chips for the display, recording, playback, encoding and decoding digital video and images for use with cameras; cameras with liquid crystal display projectors; digital cameras with liquid crystal display projectors; liquid crystal exposure apparatus in the nature of photographic exposure meters and structural parts thereof; cases especially made for photographic apparatus and instruments; filters for ultraviolet rays for cameras and digital cameras; filters for cameras and digital cameras; flash-bulbs for cameras and digital cameras; flashlights for cameras and digital cameras; shutter releases for cameras and digital cameras; shutters for cameras and digital cameras; photographic slides; spools for cameras and digital cameras; stands for photographic apparatus; photographic transparencies; viewfinders for cameras and digital cameras; tripods for cameras and digital cameras; epidiascopes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atomos IP Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Atomos IP Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Tetsuwan Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Atomos IP Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ATOMIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 31, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |