USPTO serial 79211756
NDTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5477746Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2018
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NDTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy M. Kenny
Timothy M. Kenny Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 1100c/o Trademark Docketing Dept.Austin, TX 78701-4255Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical and measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, borescopes; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; data processing equipment, computers; computer software for recording, processing, and editing images and videos; apparatus for the nondestructive testing of materials, namely, borescopes; computer hardware and software in connection with non-destructive testing methods for commercial and industrial purposes, namely, hardware and software for use in visual testing and inspection of industrial materials; computer hardware and software for use in quality control, namely, hardware and software for use in visual testing and inspection of industrial materials; endoscopy apparatus and endoscopic cameras for industrial purposes; probes for industrial purposes, in particular for testing machines, namely, probes for visual testing and inspection of industrial machinery; video cameras for testing machines; touch-sensitive electronic display screens for video cameras; apparatus in the nature of borescopes and cameras for security monitoring | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific analysis and testing of machines in the field of video endoscopy and non-destructive material testing, and research and design relating thereto, namely, research and design in the field of video endoscopy and non-destructive material testing; non-destructive material testing services; industrial analysis and scientific research services in the field of video endoscopy and non-destructive material testing; design and development of computer hardware and software; product research and product development of endoscopic cameras and probes, in particular for testing machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 29, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |