USPTO serial 79211982
LITTLE FARMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITTLE FARMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Baby food; dietary supplements for children; follow-up formula; infant formula; snacks for babies; ready-cooked dishes and food for babies (not for medical purposes) mainly consisting of meat, fish, poultry and cooked fruits and vegetables; ready-cooked dishes and food for babies (not for medical purposes) mainly consisting of vegetables; ready-cooked dishes and food for babies (not for medical purposes) | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Milk-based ready-made meals; milk-based beverages containing cereals; beverages based on coconut milk, nut milk, almond milk, oat milk, rice milk, soya milk (milk substitute); jellies, jams, compotes; dried and preserved fruits; milk and milk products; cereal-based beverages for use as milk substitute; edible seeds and nuts; butter made of nuts, berries; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; frozen vegetables; vegetable compote; beverages based on nuts and/or seeds (milk substitute); processed legumes, beans; preserved beans, lentils; lentils, preserved; peas, preserved; processed peas; processed tomatoes, preserved tomatoes; processed sweetcorn; preserved corn; dairy substitute products not produced from milk products, including yoghurt, cream fraiche and fromage frais, non-dairy; pre-cooked soup; instant stew | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Foodstuffs based on rice and/or cereals; breakfast cereals, porridge and grits; bread, pastries; muesli; granola; flour; flour made from beans, root vegetables or seeds; sugar; gruel; oat flakes; cereal-based snack food; bread concentrates; cake mixes; pasta; semolina; edible ices; non-dairy ice cream; batter for making pancakes; instant pancake mixes; pancakes; snack foods for children made predominantly of rice, corn and cereal; ready-made dishes containing pasta; farinaceous foods; gruel, with a milk base, for food | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit drinks; beverages and smoothies containing cereals and/or beans; smoothies; nut beverages in the form of coconut smoothies (dairy-free) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |