USPTO serial 79212039
NEBULUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEBULUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O. Box 230692New York, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment and computers; computer software for connecting hardware and/or devices to the cloud; computer software for enabling secured data communication between hardware or devices in the cloud; computer software for use in developing application programs and documents capable of exchanging data with other application programs and documents; computer operating system programs and computer utility programs for exchanging data; computer software for the integration of applications and data files; computer software for controlling and managing access cloud and/or server applications; communication software for connecting global computer networks; computer telecommunications software enabling connections to databases and/or the internet and/or the cloud; telecommunications platform software, enabling connections to databases and/or the internet and/or the cloud; computer hardware and/or devices for use with cloud computing and configurable networks between Internet or things (IoT) enabled hardware and/or devices; multi-tenant software platforms for utilizing or managing performant and secured data transfer; computer software architecture for monitoring and managing configurable networks between Internet of Things (IoT) enabled hardware and/or devices; internet of things (IoT) field gateway architecture; software for uploading, monitoring, analyzing and reporting on data acquired from network and connected hardware and/or devices; all of the foregoing for use in connection with Internet of Things (IoT) software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software solutions; computer software design; technical consultancy relating to the use of computer software; installation and maintenance of computer programs; research and consultancy in the field of software; computer technology consultancy and information in connection with computer system integration; computer software testing services; consultancy in the field of Internet of Things (IoT) solutions; IT integration services for computer software and software applications; computer systems integration services; IT integration services in connection with Internet of Things (IoT) communications, namely by providing a software service that allows device cloud connectivity; providing use of field and cloud gateway computer software for use in connecting internet of things (IoT) enabled hardware and/or devices; IT consulting services in the field of cloud computing; IT consulting services in the fields of cloud computing solutions; technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, server administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; all of the foregoing for use in connection with Internet of Things (IoT) software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |