USPTO serial 79212277
VIGNOBLES & COMPAGNIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS, KEISHA MONIQUE HARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIGNOBLES & COMPAGNIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Scott Gerien
J. Scott Gerien Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1455 First StreetSte. 301NAPA, CA 94559Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages excluding beers; wines | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; commercial business management; commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services of others; dissemination of advertisements; online advertising on computer networks; demonstration of goods, presentation of goods, particularly alcoholic beverages except beers, and wines, on all communication media, for retail purposes; retail store services and online retail store services featuring alcoholic beverages except beers, and featuring wines; business administration, namely, preparation of contracts for the purchase and sale of goods particularly alcoholic beverages except beers, wines, wines with a protected appellation of origin, wines with a protected geographical indication | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |