Drawing for DEVICE IDENT

USPTO serial 79212457

DEVICE IDENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5577744Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2018
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEVICE IDENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shannon Marie McKeon

Shannon Marie McKeon Dykema Gossett PLLC1301 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for automatically linking with a computer database for detecting, interpreting, and evaluating credit card and bank account transactions in the fields of fraud prevention and risk managementSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer software design; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for automatically linking with a computer database for detecting, interpreting, and evaluating credit card and bank account transactions in the fields of fraud prevention and risk management; rental of computers and computer software; maintenance of computer softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 21, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 25, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 25, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 9, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 9, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 30, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 30, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 15, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 24, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance