Drawing for GILGEN

USPTO serial 79212486

GILGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRINGER, DANIEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GILGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dwayne K. Goetzel

Dwayne K. Goetzel MEYERTONS, HOOD, KIVLIN, KOWERT & GOETZEP.O. Box 398Austin, TX 78767-0398UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Handling and storage pallets, storage stands for metal containers for storage and transportation of goods, doors and gates, pipes, shaped pipes, rails, all these goods made of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007Transporting systems comprised of conveyor belts, hydraulic, pneumatic and electric controls, elevators, pumps and compressed-air motors, motors for controlling doors and gates; pumps for machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Electric and optical apparatus and instruments for weighing, measuring, signaling and monitoring, namely, monitoring sensors for monitoring temperature and pressure; control installations and monitors, namely, access control systems and apparatus and devices for personal identification, namely, reading devices being data processing devices, central processing units for data processing and interlocking doors; automatic electronic access control systems for interlocking revolving doors; photoelectric barriers and controls in the nature of electric motion sensors and electrical controllers; electric couplings; computers and computer peripherals; data media, namely, blank CDs, blank DVDs; blank flash drives, hard disk drives; recorded computer operating programsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
019Doors and gates not made of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Drafting of constructions plans for building-access systems, storage systems, transport systems and distribution systems; writing of computer programs, namely, writing of computer software; technological advice and analysis and development of technology in the fields of automatic access to buildings, internal transport and storage of goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 30, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 2, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 10, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2017SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance