USPTO serial 79212637
KINGPIN AGV MOTION REGULATOR & CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5526768Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2018
- Examiner
- SCHWARZ, KATHLEEN MICHELLE HUD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINGPIN AGV MOTION REGULATOR & CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisel M. Ferguson
Lisel M. Ferguson Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Position reference systems comprising software, hardware, cameras, lasers, radio-frequency identification (RFID) apparatus, and beacons for use in directing the motion, stopping and loading points for autonomous robotic vehicles, such as those used in warehouses, so that they may navigate around shelving and racking and other objects, collect specific goods from specific shelves or places, load them into a temporary container or storage device and deposit them at a defined point for onward distribution; robotic vehicle sensor systems, namely, GPS-aided and radio frequency identification (RFID) based navigation systems for use in navigating autonomous robotic vehicles within environments such as warehouses and storage areas; electronic devices for locating and tracking robotic vehicles using computer hardware, computer software and global positioning systems for use in locating autonomous robotic vehicles within environments such as warehouses and storage areas; robotic vehicle sensor systems, namely, GPS-aided and RFID-based navigation systems and electronic devices for locating and tracking robotic vehicles using computer hardware, computer software and global positioning systems comprised of laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and radio frequency identification (RFID) based position reference sensors, reference targets and natural feature recognition sensors, computer hardware and computer software; laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and radio frequency identification (RFID) based position reference sensors for use with control applications for robotic and autonomous vehicles; collision avoidance systems for vehicles, namely, hardware and software that track the location of a robot by reference to various beacons pre-placed within the warehouse and stops it from hitting the shelving; collision avoidance systems for vehicles comprised of laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and radio frequency identification (RFID) based position reference sensors; collision avoidance systems for vehicles comprised of laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and radio frequency identification (RFID) based position reference sensors, reference targets and natural feature recognition sensors, computer hardware and computer software; proximity sensors for automated guide vehicles and mobile platform control applications for robotic and autonomous vehicles; software for mapping the environment of automated guide vehicles and mobile platform control applications for robotic and autonomous vehicles; software for creating digital maps for use by automated guide vehicles and mobile platform control applications for robotic and autonomous vehicles; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, namely, structural replacement parts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Guidance Automation Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Guidance Automation Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Guidance Automation Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named KINGPIN AGV MOTION REGULATOR & CONTROL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |