Drawing for THOM WIR BAUEN LÖSUNGEN

USPTO serial 79212638

THOM WIR BAUEN LÖSUNGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5393662Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 6, 2018
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with THOM WIR BAUEN LÖSUNGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis S. Prahl

Dennis S. Prahl Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Belt conveyors; filling machines; electric welding machines for plastic packaging; electric welding machines; belt conveyors; conveyor belts; packaging machinesACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of filling machines, belt conveyors, belt machines, electromechanical machines for the food industry, kneading machines, machines for the beverage and food industry, packaging machines, electric welding machines, electric welding machines for plastic packaging, machines for attaching caps, conveyors, mixing machines, slicing machines, sealing machines for industrial purposes, sorting machines for industrial purposes and cutting machinesACTIVE—
042Engineering services, in particular design and development of manufacturing and processing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 7, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 4, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 6, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 29, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 28, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance