Drawing for ICEEDGE

USPTO serial 79212799

ICEEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5542960Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2018
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ICEEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Evan A. Raynes

Evan A. Raynes Symbus Law Group PLLC1775 I Street, NW, Suite 1150Washington, DC 20006United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric and electronic apparatus and equipment, [ not included in other classes, ] for analogue, digital [ or optical control and ] amplification of audio signals, namely, audio switching apparatus and self-oscillating audio amplifiers; amplifiers, power amplifiers; [ televisions, televisions with built-in VCR-players, DVD players, radio receivers or units for accessing global computer networks, namely, computers, tablets and mobile phones; ] loudspeakers, loudspeakers with built in amplifiers; loudspeaker cabinets; electronic control units for regulation of sound signals; [ CD players and recorders; radios for vehicles; amplifiers for vehicles, power amplifiers for vehicles; headphones; ] remote control units for audio amplifiers; control units for audio amplifiers; software for the remote control of light, sound or picture signals; [ computer programmes recorded on tapes, cards, discs or other media for use in amplifiers and transformers for audio enhancement; disc storage containers; software for electric and electronic apparatus and equipment, namely, software to control and improve audio and video equipment sound quality; ] microelectronic components, namely, [ central processing units, ] gate array integrated circuits, digital signal processors, application specific integrated circuits, and microcontrollers; integrated circuit chips; electronic chips for the manufacturer of integrated circuits; chipsets for audio apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 16, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 18, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 18, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 9, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 13, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2019INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 21, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2018COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 19, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 21, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2018LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 7, 2018LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 25, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 18, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 9, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 5, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 3, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance