USPTO serial 79212870
NITTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NITTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Drain outlet cleaning detergents with disinfecting effect for household use (terms considered linguistically incorrect by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); laundry bleach; disinfecting laundry preparations; laundry preparations with deodorizing effect; detergents with deodorizing effect; abrasive paper (sandpaper); abrasive cloth; abrasive sand; shoes cream (terms considered linguistically incorrect by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); cosmetics and toiletries; adhesives for affixing false hair; adhesives for affixing false eyelashes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Mattresses; hat hooks not of metal; clothes hooks, not of metal; curtain hooks; parts for windows not of metal (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); cushion tapes/sheets for furniture corners and edges; door stoppers for desks, shelves, refrigerators (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); hooks not of metal; plastic caps for soy sauce; door stoppers (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); door stoppers for refrigerators (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); drawer stoppers (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); corner cushions for furniture; anti-tip braces for furniture (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); auxiliary levers for doorknobs; towel rack not of metal (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); kitchen clips (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | Door mats of metal; floor coverings; floor mats; toilet mats; mats; non-slip mats; door mats | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |