USPTO serial 79212933
BALTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARHART, DAVID JAMES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BALTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic machines, apparatus and their parts, namely, computers, calculators; computer programs for creating and designing prototypes of software and websites that are shareable amongst devices; computer application software for creating and designing prototypes of software and websites that are shareable amongst devices; consumer video game programs; game programs for arcade video game machines; software applications for use with mobile devices for creating and designing prototypes of software and websites that are shareable amongst devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design, computer programming, and maintenance of computer software; design, programming, and maintenance of application software; consultancy relating to design, programming, or maintenance of application software; creating and maintaining web sites for others; rental of computers; providing online non-downloadable software for creating and designing prototypes of software and websites that are shareable amongst devices; providing online non-downloadable application software via communications networks in order to enable users to share prototypes of software and websites across devices; computer graphics design services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |