Drawing for MIXARS

USPTO serial 79212936

MIXARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MIXARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Acoustic couplers; loudspeakers; sub-woofers; amplifiers; sound amplifiers; electronic amplifiers; digital amplifiers; stereo amplifiers; headphone amplifiers; amplifiers for musical instruments; wireless communication apparatus; audio processing apparatus; audio amplifiers; sound mixers; sound level meters; sound recording apparatus; sound reproduction apparatus; sound transmitting apparatus; computer software applications, downloadable; radios; cabinets for loudspeakers; audio mixing consoles; crossover, being band-pass filters, including active and passive crossovers; headphones; diaphragms, being acoustics; recording discs; sound samplers; dictating machines; electronic audio signal processors for compensating sound distortion in speakers; digital sound processors; downloadable music files; record players; compact disc players; disk drives for computers; DVD players; readers, being data processing equipment; portable media players; optical character readers; megaphones; microphones; sound mixers with integrated amplifiers; analogue sound modifiers; computer programs, being downloadable software; computer operating programs, recorded; computer programmes, being programs, recorded; needles for record players; speed regulators for record players; racks for amplifiers; personal stereos; electrified rails for mounting spot lights; software to control and improve audio equipment sound quality; music-composition software; wireless high frequency transmission instruments; wireless transmitters; sound recording carriers; stands for loudspeaker; tablet computers; horns for loudspeakers; processors, being central processing units, computer peripheral devices; communication interface unitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 13, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 29, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 15, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 29, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 26, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance