USPTO serial 79212968
TARSKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TARSKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for analysis of computer software; computer software for analysis of data; computer software for cost analysis; computer software for compilation, systematization, management, maintenance, updating, processing and searching of data in electronic databases; computer databases related to the analysis of computer software, of data and of costs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Compilation, systematization, management, maintenance, updating, processing and searching of data in electronic databases; cost analysis services; cost benefit analysis services; business statistical analysis services; business data analysis services; information, advice and consultancy regarding the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for analysis of computer software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for analysis of data; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for cost analysis; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for compilation, systematization, management, maintenance, updating, processing and searching of data in electronic databases; computer software analysis services; technical data analysis services; information, advice and consultancy regarding the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |