Drawing for HELIOBRUSH

USPTO serial 79213089

HELIOBRUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5409675Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 27, 2018
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELIOBRUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew R. Jenkins

Matthew R. Jenkins Jacox, Meckstroth & Jenkins2310 Far Hills AvenueKettering, OH 45419UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Polishing preparationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Machine parts, namely, polishing discs, polishing wheels and polishing brushes for machines for polishing printing plates, printing cylinders, gravure printing cylinders or embossing forms; brushes for use with machines for polishing printing plates, printing cylinders, gravure printing cylinders or embossing forms; electric machines for polishing printing plates, printing cylinders, gravure printing cylinders or embossing forms; Electrically-operated brushes, being parts of machines; machines for polishing printing plates, printing cylinders, gravure printing cylinders or embossing forms, featuring brushesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Polishing brushes for printing cylinders, gravure printing cylinders or embossing formsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 9, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 13, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 27, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 27, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 31, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 29, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance