Drawing for EDGE

USPTO serial 79213256

EDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand-operated implements for chopping, dicing or slicing food, kitchen knives and table cutlery knives, forks and spoons; table cutlery knives, forks and spoons; boxes adapted for cutleryACTIVE—
021Household or kitchen utensils and containers; tableware, other than knives, forks and spoons; glassware, porcelain and earthenware; pots; flower pots, flowerpot covers, not of paper; jardinieres; flower bowls; planters of earthenware; dishes; basins (bowls), vases; serving cutlery (kitchen utensils), mixing spoons (kitchen utensils); trays for domestic purposes, serving trays, cutlery trays; oil and vinegar cruets, wine trays, trays for candles, plates; serving platters; teapots; milk churns; milk churns; basins bowls; earthenware basins; shallow bowls; serving bowls; sugar bowls; cups; mugs; pitchers; coolers for wine; storage containers, heat-insulated containers for beverages; coasters, not of paper and other than table linen; glass mats, not of paper and other than table linen; biscuit tins; jars; jugs of earthenware; candelabra (candlesticks), china ornaments, salt and pepper pots, hand-operated salt and pepper mills, bowls (basins), butter dishes, soap containers, soap holders, toothbrush mugs and holders for toothbrush mugs; statues, figurines, plaques and works of art, made of materials such as porcelain, terra-cotta or glass, included in the classACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 29, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 8, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 9, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 31, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance