Drawing for BAPPY

USPTO serial 79213287

BAPPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BAPPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Baby carriersACTIVE—
020Supports to hold babies in laying face down, reclining or sitting positions; bassinets; cradles; cots; baby bouncer; bouncinette; babies' baskets; babies' bouncing chairs; babies' chairs; baby nests in the nature of padded baby carriers; furniture for babies; seats adapted for babies; support pillows for use in baby seating; furnitureACTIVE—
024Swaddles; swaddling blankets; children's blankets; cot blankets; blanket throws; textiles and sheets; bed coversACTIVE—
035Retail and wholesale services including those provided on-line; retail and wholesale services including those provided on-line in relation to supports to hold babies in laying face down, reclining or sitting positions, basinettes, cradles, cots, baby bouncer, bouncinette, babies' baskets, babies' bouncing chairs, babies' chairs, baby carriers, baby nests in the nature of padded baby carriers, furniture for babies, seats adapted for babies, support pillows for use in baby seating, swaddles, swaddling blankets, children's blankets, cot blankets, blanket throws, textiles and sheets, bed covers and furniture; advertising; business management and administrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 6, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance