Drawing for AQIRA

USPTO serial 79213424

AQIRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5718447Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 9, 2019
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AQIRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ken M. Sheets

Ken M. Sheets Whitestone Law PLLC1850 Towers Crescent PlazaTysons, VA 22182United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for analyzing measured data and performing computer aided engineering to determine durability, fatigue and reliability in the field of engineering analysis, and for creating searchable databases of information and data, and for remote monitoring and surveillance of engineering structures and systems, and for graphical visualization of measured data and computer simulations, and for providing web-based access to analysis processesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for analyzing measured data and performing computer aided engineering to determine durability, fatigue and reliability in the field of engineering analysis, and for creating searchable databases of information and data, and for remote monitoring and surveillance of engineering structures and systems, and for graphical visualization of measured data and computer simulations, and for providing web-based access to analysis processesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 2, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 28, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 23, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 9, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 6, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 7, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 7, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 7, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 8, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 6, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance