USPTO serial 79213425
VIBESYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5718448Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2019
- Examiner
- SERVANCE, RENEE L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with VIBESYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer UK Ltd.
GB
South Yorkshire Rotherham, GB
South Yorkshire Rotherham, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ken M. Sheets
Ken M. Sheets Whitestone Law PLLC1850 Towers Crescent PlazaTysons, VA 22182United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for performing acoustics and vibration analysis, for performing analysis for early fault detection in rotating machinery, for performing analysis for rating human reactions to sounds and vibrations, for performing analysis for characterizing the dynamics of a structure, for performing time and frequency analysis, for entering, editing, and viewing vibration specification data, for monitoring health and life-cycle usage of structures, for operational usage severity and prognostics, for creating, sharing, and running engineering applications and analysis processes, for identifying critical locations and calculating realistic fatigue lives, for performing durability analysis, for the automated storage, analysis and reporting of engineering data, for reliability life data analysis, for accelerated test planning and quantitative accelerated life testing data analysis for software reliability testing for the purpose of system reliability, availability, maintainability and related analyses, for building and running complex analyses of acoustics and vibration using probabilistic analysis and deterministic scenarios for applying reliability growth models to analyze data from developmental testing and fielded repairable systems, for applying reliability prediction analysis based on the major published standards, for analysis and reporting of failure mode and Effects Analysis data, for monitoring software performance for the purpose of utilizing the Reliability Centered Maintenance analysis approach for creating scheduled maintenance plans, for monitoring software performance for the purpose of utilizing the Risk Based Inspection analysis for oil and gas, chemical and power plants, for creating Maintenance Steering Group compliant software maintenance programs for the aircraft/aerospace industry, for performing a web-based failure reporting, analysis and taking corrective action for software failures, and for two or three-dimensional simulation for use in design and development of industrial products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer UK Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by HBM United Kingdom Limited
- Other trademarks owned by HBM United Kingdom Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VIBESYS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | TRDE | REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION DENIED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ERFT | TEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |