USPTO serial 79213451
SAVINI TARTUFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAVINI TARTUFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra M. Koenig
SANDRA M KOENIG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVENUE5TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried truffles being edible fungi; truffles, preserved; dairy based spreads; anchovy, not live; anchovy fillets, not live; anchovy paste; truffle juice; fruit, preserved; preserved vegetables; processed fruits; processed fungi, namely, dried edible fungi; processed vegetables; beans, preserved; tuna, not live; mushrooms, preserved; tomato preserves; cheese; sausages; butter | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chocolates; chocolate truffles; truffle flour; truffle honey; vinegar; flavoured vinegar; ready-made sauces; pasta sauce; pasta; rice; polenta; mayonnaise; mustard; bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cookies, cakes, pastries; panettone; salt; seasonings; cereal-based snack foods; dipping sauces | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Truffles, fresh | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |