USPTO serial 79213469
OUTBACK PROVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OUTBACK PROVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Lisi
MICHAEL A LISI BRIDGE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES23716 WOODWARD AVEPLEASANT RIDGE, MI 48069-1130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Evaluating organizations to determine whether the organizations conform to an established accreditation standard in the field of automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories; information services in the field of quality standards relating to automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories; developing quality standards in the field of automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories; testing, analysis and evaluation of automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories with commercial standards; testing, analysis and evaluation of automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories with industry standards; authentication in the field of automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories; technical testing of automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories; component testing of automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories; engineering testing of automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories; industrial research of new products; inspection of automotive and four wheel drive vehicles, parts and accessories for quality control; product failure analysis | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |