USPTO serial 79213523
WHO'S THE BOSS ?!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NASSERGHODSI, SAHAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHO'S THE BOSS ?!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish; poultry; game; meat extracts; preserved fruit; frozen fruits; dried fruits; cooked fruits; preserved vegetables; deep-frozen vegetables; dried vegetables; cooked vegetables; jellies; jams; compotes; eggs; milk; dairy products; edible oils and fats; fats for food; butter; charcuterie; salted meats; crustaceans (not live); canned meat; canned fish; cheeses; milk beverages, milk predominating | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; flour; cereal preparations; bread; pastries; confectionery; edible ices; honey; golden syrup; yeast; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces (condiments); spices; ice for refreshment; sandwiches; pizzas; pancakes; biscuits, cookies; cakes; rusks; sugar confectionery; chocolate; cocoa-based beverages; coffee-based beverages; tea-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Agricultural and aquaculture products, horticultural and forestry products; live animals; fresh fruits; fresh vegetables; seeds (grains); natural plants; natural flowers; animal foodstuffs; malt; natural turf; live crustaceans; live bait for fishing; unprocessed cereal grains; shrubs; plants; seedlings; trees (plants); fresh citrus fruits; unsawn timber; fodder | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral waters (beverages); carbonated waters; fruit-based beverages; fruit juices; syrups for beverages; preparations for making beverages; lemonades; fruit nectars; soda water; non-alcoholic aperitifs | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages (except beers); wines; wines protected by an appellation of origin; wines protected by a geographical indication | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M. Nicolas CHABANNE
- Other trademarks owned by LMDM
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named WHO'S THE BOSS ?!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |