Drawing for MRAG

USPTO serial 79213542

MRAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5483183Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 5, 2018
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MRAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Govinda M. Davis

Govinda M. Davis Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 East Fifth Street, Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Supply chain business auditing servicesACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, training services in the field of fisheries assessment, data interpretation and analysis, computer software, fisheries economic methods, resource economics, fishing license compliance, control, surveillance and enforcement, fisheries planning development and management, licensing regimes, fisheries stock assessment and management, data and information management, environmental assessments, international fishing rights, establishment of fisheries regimesACTIVE—
042Consultancy services relating to research in the field of environmental protection, consultancy in the field of scientific research in the fields of environmental impact assessment and sustainable management of natural resources; consultancy relating to quality control; auditing of quality control, namely, scientific research relating to the efficiency of quality control and scientific consultancy services relating to environmental planning as well as quality auditsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 2, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 30, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 10, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance