Drawing for GIORIK

USPTO serial 79213567

GIORIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5532299Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2018
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GIORIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John J. O'Malley

John J. O'Malley VOLPE KOENIG30 South 17th StreetSuite 1800Philadelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Cooking apparatus and installations, namely, cooking ovens, convection ovens, [ gas and electric braising pans, cooking ranges, gas and electric pasta cookers, gas and electric fryers, and gas and electric griddle fry tops; electric cooking utensils in the nature of electric deep fryers; electric kettles; ] electric grillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 23, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 10, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 7, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2018PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Mar 6, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 31, 2018TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2018AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 29, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance