USPTO serial 79213598
ROSE D'ANVERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROSE D'ANVERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
Alex Patel Patel & Almeida, P.C.16830 Ventura Blvd Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Diamond; gems; jewelry; Jewelry set with diamonds; watches set with diamonds; Decorative ornaments set with gems and diamond flakes, namely, ornamental lapel pins, ornamental button covers being jewelry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, belts; Footwear; Headwear; all of the aforementioned goods including types printed with and covered with precious stones and diamonds | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Natural plants and flowers; Live rose bushes; Live natural roses; Dried flowers; preserved flowers; preserved roses; Stabilized roses in the nature of dried flowers and preserved flowers; Dried flowers and preserved flowers studded with precious stones and diamond flakes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; Marketing services; business management; Business administration services; Administrative services, namely, business administration services; Mediation of advertising;Distribution of promotional items, all related to diamonds, jewels, conserved and preserved flowers, namely, sample distribution, distribution of advertising material; Business mediation in the marketing of jewelry, diamonds and gemstones, namely, mediation of agreements regarding the sale and purchase of goods; Administrative and commercial support for jewelers, namely, administrative processing of purchase orders; Retail store services in the field of diamonds and jewelry; Business mediation in the wholesaling of diamonds and jewelry, namely, mediation of agreements regarding the sale and purchase of goods; Business mediation in the commercialization of flowers and conserved and preserved flowers, namely, mediation of agreements regarding the sale and purchase of goods; Retail store services in the field of canned and preserved flowers; Business mediation in the wholesale conserved and preserved flowers, namely, mediation of agreements regarding the sale and purchase of goods; all the aforesaid services whether or not online | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROSE D'ANVERS, besloten vennootschap metbeperkte aansprakelijkheid
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ROSE D'ANVERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |