USPTO serial 79213661
JUDITH WILLIAMS SKIN REVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUDITH WILLIAMS SKIN REVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Barrese
LORENZ SEIDLER GOSSEL Rechtsanwälte Patentanwälte Partnerschaft mbBWidenmayerstr. 2380538 München,GERMANYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Make-up removing preparations; astringents for cosmetic purposes; amber perfume; antiperspirants; eyebrow cosmetics; eyebrow pencils; bath salts, not for medical purposes; bleaching cream for the skin; deodorants for personal use; scented water; greases for cosmetic purposes; hair spray; hair wash preparations; hair lotions; skin cream cosmetic; skin care products; cosmetics; cosmetic kits filled; cosmetic pencils; cosmetic bath additives; artificial nails; artificial eyelashes; lipsticks; lotions for cosmetic purposes; make-up; nail polish; nail care products; oils for body care and beauty; oils for cosmetic purposes; oils for perfumes and scents; perfumery goods; perfumes; vegetable flavoring agents for beverages essential oils; aftershave; rose oil; make-up; make-up preparations; make-up powder; beauty masks; soaps; shampoos; sunscreen products cosmetic preparations for skin tanning; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; mascara; tooth bleaching gels; dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicinal hair growth preparations; mineral food supplements; food supplements based on amino acids; food supplements based on minerals; food supplements based on trace elements; vitamin preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |