USPTO serial 79213737
IMPACIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5588453Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2018
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with IMPACIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
Berlin, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cecilia R. Dickson
Cecilia R. Dickson The Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Live plants and natural flowers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Martina Feindura
- Other trademarks owned by Martina Feindura
- Other trademarks owned by Martina Feindura
- Other trademarks owned by Martina Feindura
- Other trademarks owned by Andrea Ludwig
- Other trademarks owned by Andrea Michalik
- Other trademarks owned by Andrea Michalik
- Other trademarks owned by Andrea Michalik
- Other trademarks owned by Elsner pac
- Other trademarks owned by Elsner pac Jungpflanzen GbR
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named IMPACIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |