USPTO serial 79214088
RIMAXIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5777921Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 2019
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with RIMAXIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ritec Rohr-Inspektionstechnik GmbH
Haldenwang, DE
Other trademarks owned by Ritec Rohr-Inspektionstechnik GmbH
Ritec Rohr-Inspektionstechnik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Ritec Rohr-Inspektionstechnik GmbH
Ritec Rohr-Inspektionstechnik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Ritec Rohr-Inspektionstechnik GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
Mark J. Liss Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Checking, supervision, apparatus and checking, supervision, instruments, apparatus and instruments for inspection purposes, in particular for inspecting pipes and ducts, namely, inspection machines for the physical inspection of pipes and ducts, optical inspection apparatus; image capturing apparatus, namely, apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of images for the inspection of pipes and ducts; apparatus for the reproduction of images for the inspection of pipes and ducts; apparatus for the transmission of images for the inspection of pipes and ducts; visual monitoring apparatus, namely, thin film transistor screens; cameras, in particular digital cameras for purposes of inspecting pipes and ducts; tilting heads; video devices, namely, cameras for monitoring and inspecting of pipes and ducts; Camcorders, namely, for the inspection of pipes and ducts; video monitors for the inspection of pipes and ducts; laser sensors, laser detectors for the inspection of pipes and ducts; lasers for measuring purposes, laser measuring apparatus, namely, laser doppler for measuring purposes, measuring apparatus, namely, laser distance meters, laser measuring systems; Computer operating systems and electronic controls for all the aforesaid apparatus, instruments and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ritec Rohr-Inspektionstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Ritec Rohr-Inspektionstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Ritec Rohr-Inspektionstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RIMAXIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |