USPTO serial 79214211
FLEUR ALPINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEUR ALPINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, still (non-carbonated) drinking water, sparkling water; whey beverages; fruit beverages; syrups for beverages; fruit juices, namely, apple, juice; fruit juices; non alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; waters beverages; fruit nectars, non alcoholic; tomato juice beverages; beverages, namely, vegetable juices | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 3, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |