USPTO serial 79214259
WALKALLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5634884Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2018
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WALKALLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
County Londonderry BT47 2NS, GB
County Londonderry BT47 2NS, GB
County Londonderry BT47 2NS, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Kershaw Dreitler
Joseph Kershaw Dreitler DREITLER TRUE LLC19 E. Kossuth StreetColumbus, OH 43206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for online dating through matching users based on user-created profiles in the field of social networking, Social introduction services; application software for online dating through matching users based on user-created profiles in the field of social networking, Social introduction services; downloadable computer software applications for online dating through matching users based on user-created profiles in the field of social networking, Social introduction services; application software for mobile phones for online dating through matching users based on user-created profiles in the field of social networking, Social introduction services; software and applications for mobile devices for dating through matching users based on user-created profiles in the field of social networking, Social introduction services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Social introduction services; dating services; Internet based dating, matchmaking and personal introduction services; online social networking services; Internet-based social networking services; online social networking services accessible by means of downloadable mobile applications; personal introduction agency services; personal introduction services by computer through the Internet; Internet based personal introduction services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 25, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |