USPTO serial 79214432
LEDIBELLE APPENZELL NATURAL COSMETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5582697Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2018
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEDIBELLE APPENZELL NATURAL COSMETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Svetlana Schnorr
Albert Koch AG Albert KochGschwendlistrasse 9CH-9108 Jakobsbad,SWITZERLANDGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances all for laundry use, namely, fabric softeners, laundry blueing, laundry starch, laundry soap, laundry detergent and laundry sizing, all for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, degreasing and abrasive preparations for household purposes; non-medicated soaps, perfumery, essential oils, non-medicated cosmetics, non-medicated lotions for hair; non-medicated dentifrices; all the aforesaid goods are of Swiss origin | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |