USPTO serial 79214458
EB EGO BODEGAS INFINITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5557659Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2018
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EB EGO BODEGAS INFINITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick C. Stephenson
Patrick C. Stephenson Kutak Rock LLP1650 Farnam StreetOmaha, NE 68102United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine from Jumilla | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |