USPTO serial 79214541
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Curran
Matthew J. Curran Maine Cernota & Curran547 Amherst StreetSuite 300Nashua, NH 03033| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [Regulating apparatus, namely, mill calibration device; measuring devices, namely, dimensional electronic control devices, namely, profile gauge, section gauge, flatness gauge, width gauge, thickness gauge, electronic surface quality control devices, process electronic control devices, namely, hot metal detectors, steel level measuring devices, slag level measuring devices, loop detectors, namely, optical sensors designed to detect the position of infrared emitting bodies, speed meters, namely, contactless speed measurement instruments; data processing apparatus] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [Business management and organization consultancy; business management assistance; business management consultancy; commercial or industrial management assistance; ] computerized file management; professional business consultancy; updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; consultancy relating to business efficiency; business process management and consulting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cloud computing computer programming; computer security consultancy, computer software consultancy; computer software design; computer system analysis; computer system design; computer technology consultancy; [technical consultancy in the field of energy-saving electronic data storage;] engineering information technology IT consultancy: installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; [off site data backup; quality control for others; rental of computer software; research and development of new products for others;] software as a service SaaS featuring software for business analytics and predictive analytics solutions, manufacturing execution systems, maintenance management systems, warehouse management systems, process control systems, equipment control systems, energy management systems, [condition monitoring systems,] software dedicated to the coordination and optimization of supply-chain, technological and maintenance processes in the metals industry; computer technological consultancy, updating of computer software; [engineering services relating to robotics;] design and development of computer software for process control; research relating to the computerized automation of industrial processes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2019 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |