Drawing for IOT

USPTO serial 79214782

IOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5526796Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2018
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with IOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jared M. Barrett

Jared M. Barrett Seed IP Law Group LLP701 Fifth AvenueSuite 5400Seattle, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electrical squeezers for fruit and vegetable; [ dough kneading machines for household purposes; coffee grinders, other than hand-operated and not for household purposes; ] electric food processors; electric fruit presses; food preparation machines, electromechanical, namely, electric food processors [ ; electrical coffee grinders; noodle making machines; coffee extracting machines; grating machines for vegetables; debarking machines; vacuum packing machines for food; packing machines under vacuum ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 1, 2026INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 7, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 7, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 3, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 29, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 31, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance