USPTO serial 79214915
KIKKI.K
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIKKI.K?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Charms for key chains; charms for key rings; key chains; key rings; key fobs; charms for jewellery; mobile phone accessory charms; adhesive wall decorations of precious metal; decorative articles (trinkets or jewellery) for personal use; decorative boxes coated with precious metal; decorative brooches (jewellery); decorative objects fashioned (ornaments) plated with precious metals; jewellery articles, boxes and cases; jewellery organiser displays; key rings incorporating trinkets and fobs; clocks; decorative ornaments for mobile phones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 31, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2019 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |