USPTO serial 79214997
SODA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SODA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Television broadcasting; message sending; computer aided transmission of messages and images; electronic mail; electronic bulletin board services telecommunications services; providing user access to global computer networks; rental of access time to global computer networks; providing internet chatrooms; providing access to databases; voice mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Physical education; organization of competitions education or entertainment; arranging and conducting of congresses; organization of sports competitions; publication of electronic books and journals on-line; providing on-line electronic publications, not downloadable; production of programmes; entertainment; entertainment information; game services provided on-line from a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Material testing; industrial design; computer programming; computer software design; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; hosting computer sites web sites; computer software consultancy; providing search engines for the internet; intangible assets evaluation (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |