Drawing for OCTOPAI

USPTO serial 79215041

OCTOPAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCTOPAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley D. Crose

BRADLEY D CROSE CROSE LAW LLC112 NORTHBROOKE TRACEWOODSTOCK, GA 30188UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cross platform, namely, computer software platform for advanced mapping and analysis of foundation organizations in the nature of business intelligence services and monitoring for an enterprise client; computer hardware of software systems for mapping and displaying lateral status picture of data in IT foundation in organization in the nature of business intelligence, metadata, namely, tools for automation of organizations processes in organization information systems in the nature of metadata management for an enterprise clientACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 30, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 2, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 25, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 15, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 28, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 28, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 28, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 26, 2018LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 29, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 28, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 28, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 7, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance