USPTO serial 79215080
EGGSPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE-RICHARDSON HA, BRITTANY NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EGGSPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D Wells
NICHOLAS D WELLS LEGENDS LAW GROUP PLLC330 N MAIN STKAYSVILLE, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for providing remote support in the kitchen, remote support in cooking, management of recipes, management of food ingredient lists and food inventories, cooking instruction for adults, meal planning, interactive cooking courses for adults, and management of health information and related dietary needs and eating activities; computer software applications, downloadable for providing remote support in the kitchen, remote support in cooking, management of recipes, management of food ingredient lists and food inventories, cooking instruction for adults, meal planning, interactive cooking courses for adults, and management of health information and related dietary needs and eating activities | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development and design of computer software for use in managing food and meal plans within a kitchen, for providing cooking instructions for adults, and for managing a user's health information, dietary needs, and eating activities; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for providing remote support in the kitchen, remote support in cooking, management of recipes, management of food ingredient lists and food inventories, cooking instruction for adults, meal planning, interactive cooking courses for adults, and management of health information and related dietary needs and eating activities; technological consultancy in the technology field of computer software for use in managing food and meal plans within a kitchen, for providing cooking instructions for adults, and for managing a user's health information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |