USPTO serial 79215143
SUPER NANO ELECTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPER NANO ELECTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Rubber; electrical insulating rubber products; liquid rubber; foam rubber; rubber for electrical insulation; rubber sheets for insulating; sealing elements consisting of rubber; articles made of rubber for jointing purposes; articles made of rubber for insulation purposes; pipe wrappings of rubber for protective purposes; plastics in extruded form for use injection mould for auto motor parts; protective acrylic spray coatings for insulating purposes; rubber (liquid -); rubber in liquid form; flexible hoses for conveying liquids; rubber sheathing for gas lines for protection against salt water corrosion; rubber sheathing for oil flow lines to protect against salt water corrosion; adhesive tapes for anti-corrosion; electrical insulating materials; electrical tape; insulators for electronic use; electrical insulation articles and materials; insulators for electric mains; electromagnetic interference shielding gaskets; insulating sleeves for power lines; varnishes (insulating -) for applying to electronic components; plastic films for electronic insulation; polymer film used for manufacturing electronic circuits; electrical insulating material of mica particles in pliant glass; transparent acrylic sheets for shielding against electromagnetic waves; transparent acrylic sheets incorporating shielding for electromagnetic waves; varnishes for electrical insulation for application to electronic components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |