USPTO serial 79215445
INSTINCTIVE BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSTINCTIVE BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Sofer
Joseph Sofer IPSILON USA, LLP215 Lexington AveSUITE 1301New York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; perfumes; eaux de toilette; eau de cologne; body deodorants (perfumery); essential oils; soaps; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; cosmetic creams, gels, milks, lotions, masks, pomades, powders and preparations for skin care; cosmetic anti-wrinkle products; cosmetic lip-care products; cosmetic sunscreen products; cosmetic skin-tanning preparations; cosmetic after-sun products; cosmetic preparations for slimming; depilatory products; hair care preparations; cosmetic preparations for scalp care; cosmetic preparations for the bath and shower; make-up and make-up removing products; shaving preparations and after-shave preparations; wipes and tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Hygienic and beauty care for human beings or animals; massage services; hairdressing salons; beauty salons; sauna services; provision of spa facilities; balneotherapy, physiotherapy and aromatherapy services; Turkish bath services; advisory services relating to beauty and make-up | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |