USPTO serial 79215448
CARPACCIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARPACCIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Biological analysis software; muscle cut image analysis software; cell image analysis software; analysis software of biological tissues; composite material image analysis software; nano-material image analysis software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Biological analysis services; online biological analysis services; researches in the field of biology; installation of biological analysis software; consulting relating to biological analysis software; developing design of biological analysis software; maintenance of biological analysis software; updating of biological analysis software; analysis services in the field of composite materials; on-line analysis services in the field of composite materials; researches in the field of composite materials; installation of analysis software in the field of composite materials; consultancy relating to analysis software in the field of composite materials; developing design of analysis software in the field of composite materials; maintenance of analysis software in the field of composite materials; updating of analysis software in the field of composite materials; analysis services in the field of nano-materials; on-line analysis services in the field of nano-materials; researches in the field of nano-materials; installation of analysis software in the field of nano-materials; consultancy relating to analysis software in the field of nano-materials; developing design of analysis software in the field of nano-materials; maintenance of analysis software in the field of nano-materials; updating of analysis software in the field of nano-materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Analysis of medical images; on-line services for the analysis of medical images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECOLE NORMALE SUPERIEURE DE LYON
- Other trademarks owned by UNIVERSITE CLAUDE BERNARD LYON I
- Other trademarks owned by HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON
- Other trademarks owned by CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CARPACCIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |