Drawing for SILK'N RELIEF

USPTO serial 79215487

SILK'N RELIEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5753836Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 21, 2019
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILK'N RELIEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical device for the alleviation of muscle, back and joint pain and various injury pains for the healing of sores, for the treatment of acne, arthritis, tennis elbowSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 5, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 26, 2023CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 12, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2019FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2019NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 29, 2018CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 29, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2018CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 25, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 17, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 12, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 9, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance