USPTO serial 79215514
WHITE ROSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2020
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with WHITE ROSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M SCOTT ALPRIN ALPRIN LAW OFFICES PC5 PINEHURST CIRCLE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen, dried and cooked seafood, crayfish, snails, prawns, shellfish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WELLCOME FISHERIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WELLCOME FISHERIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WELLCOME FISHERIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named WHITE ROSES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |