USPTO serial 79215644
CYBER ARMOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5614016Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2018
- Examiner
- BUKER, RACHEL EVE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBER ARMOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Scherer
Christopher M. Scherer DeWitt Ross & Stevens S.C.13935 Bishop's DriveSuite 300Brookfield, WI 53005-6605Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Navigation, guidance, track targeting and map making device, namely, devices provided with hardware and software that protects military, commercial and self-driving vehicles against data tampering and overtaking; recorded content, namely, software recorded on storage devices being external computer hard drives and flash drives and solid state drives that protects military, commercial and self-driving vehicles against data tampering and overtaking; Pre-recorded data storage devices, namely, flash drives, computer disks and solid state drives having software that protects military, commercial and self-driving vehicles against data tampering and overtaking | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Vehicles and conveyances, namely, military, commercial vehicles being automobiles, service trucks in the nature of trucks for mobile repair and service of other vehicles, service trucks in the nature of trucks for motor vehicle towing or lifting, semi-tractors trailers, buses, vans, railcars, aircraft, ships and self-driving vehicles, namely, autonomous cars, drones other than toys, unmanned all-terrain vehicles (UGVs), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and remotely operated underwater vehicles other than toys | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |